Legal Opinion
Di Rienzo v. Goldfarb
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 18, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The plaintiff, a boy fourteen years old, was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant on Shrews-bury Street, in Worcester. The street runs in an easterly and westerly direction, with double street car tracks in the centre of a reservation and an eighteen-foot cement highway on each side thereof. The evidence tended to show that west bound automobiles travelled on the north side of the reservation, and those east bound travelled on the south side; also, that before the accident traffic regulations had been adopted by the city of Worcester. Certain sections of these regulations were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rasmussen v. WhippleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Beale v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Lang v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Daris v. Middlesex & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Crimmins v. Armstrong Transfer Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BartoliniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Clay v. Pope & Cottle Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Souza v. BeckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Noyes v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Hutchinson v. H. E. Shaw Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.