Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Dore

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 4, 2008No. 2268, September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES E. MOYLAN, JR. Judge,

Retired, Specially Assigned.

Although the general rule is that if the purchaser of a property at a foreclosure sale fails to make timely payment of the purchase price he thereby becomes obligated to pay interest on the unpaid balance, there have evolved at least three recognized exemptions from the strict application of that general rule. The question before us on this appeal is whether a purchaser’s possible entitlement to one of those exemptions can be irretrievably contracted away in the very act of making the successful bid on the property.

The Present Case

The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Walther v. Sovereign BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Washington National ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Noor v. Centreville BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Zorzit v. 915 W. 36th Street, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. AMT Homes, LLC v. FishmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. North Star Properties v. NadelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Wonder City v. DipietroCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API