Fourth National Bank of Montgomery v. Bragg
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corcuit Court of city of Richmond, in an action of attachment in which the plaintiff in error intervened. Judgment for plaintiff. Intervener assigns error.
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
On December 7, 1917, W. F. Covington, trading as Covington Manufacturing Company, at Montgomery, Alabama, drew a sight draft for $1,740.21 on Manchester Mills, Richmond, Virginia, and attached thereto a bill of lading for a shipment of corn. This draft, with the bill of lading attached, was deposited by. Covington in the Fourth National Bank of Montgomery, where he had a regular account. The item was not entered for collection, but was treated as cash, and along with other cash items deposited at the same time (the total deposit being $1,875.23)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- King v. AverySupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
- Hunt v. StandartIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Amsinck v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Buckeye National Bank v. Huff & CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Hibbs v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- McAuley v. Morris Plan BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Virginia-Lincoln Furniture Corp. v. Southern Factories & Stores Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.