Legal Opinion

Resendes v. Brown

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 24, 2009No. 2007-316-AppealPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG,

for the Court.

The plaintiffs, Louisa Resendes (Re-sendes) and Charles Smith (Smith) (collectively plaintiffs), claim visitation rights with Cameron Brown (Cameron), the minor son of the defendant, Nicole Brown (Brown or defendant); they are before the Supreme Court on appeal from a Family Court order that vacated a stipulation entered into by the parties and dismissed the complaint. A justice of the Family Court vacated the stipulation and dismissed the case based on a finding that the child’s unidentified biological father was not afforded notice of the proceeding. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. BidoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. DeMarco v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  2. Hilley v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Local 569 v. City of East ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  4. In Re Miguel A.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  5. Amberleigh HUDSON v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., D/B/A GEICO General Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API