Resendes v. Brown
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice GOLDBERG,
for the Court.
The plaintiffs, Louisa Resendes (Re-sendes) and Charles Smith (Smith) (collectively plaintiffs), claim visitation rights with Cameron Brown (Cameron), the minor son of the defendant, Nicole Brown (Brown or defendant); they are before the Supreme Court on appeal from a Family Court order that vacated a stipulation entered into by the parties and dismissed the complaint. A justice of the Family Court vacated the stipulation and dismissed the case based on a finding that the child’s unidentified biological father was not afforded notice of the proceeding. We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BidoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- DeMarco v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Hilley v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Local 569 v. City of East ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- In Re Miguel A.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- Amberleigh HUDSON v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., D/B/A GEICO General Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.