Legal Opinion

In Re Miguel A.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 25, 2010No. 2009-63-AppealPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court.

This case came before the Supreme Court on March 3, 2010, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. The respondent, Miguel A. (Miguel or respondent), appeals from an adjudication of delinquency entered in the Family Court. The respondent makes numerous contentions on appeal. He argues: (1) that the trial justice erred by precluding two witnesses from testifying; (2) that the trial justice erred by denying his motions for judgment of acquittal; and (3) that his…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Esposito v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. State v. BreenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. State v. DislaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  5. State v. McKoneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KarngarSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  2. State v. KizekaiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. State v. StoreySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  4. Maurice J. Cusick v. Judith P. CusickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  5. Amberleigh HUDSON v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., D/B/A GEICO General Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API