Legal Opinion

In Re Workman's Estate

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Appellant assigns error of the court in refusing to appoint him as executor and in appointing A. .C. Callan as administrator. Section 11-206, Oregon Code 1930, as amended by Oregon Laws, 1931, chapter 235, provides thus:

“When a will is proven, letters testamentary shall be issued to the persons therein named as executors, or coexecutors, or to such of them as give notice of their acceptance of the trust and are qualified. ’ ’

Section 11-231, as amended by Oregon Laws, 1933, chapter 11, provides who is not qualified to act as an executor or administrator. The case in hand does not come within…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re Dolenty's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. In Re Proving the Will of LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. In Re Proving the Will of FloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Farnsworth v. HatchUtah Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grattan v. PihlbladSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. In Re Workman's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Allen Trust Co. v. Cowlitz BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. In Re Raat's Estate. Frandsen v. RaatUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Kleinschmidt v. MATTHIEUOregon Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API