Legal Opinion

Kleinschmidt v. MATTHIEU

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, C. J.

The question posed is whether an action for libel lies against the estate of a testator whose will contains words libelous per se. The challenged language is:

“To my grandson, Harrison Mercer Kleinschmidt, I give and bequeath the sum of ten Dollars ($10.00). I have already given my said grandson the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) which he squandered. This provision is no different than that I have made for my said grandson in preceding wills over a number of years and expresses the regard in which I hold my said grandson, who deserted his mother and myself by taking sides against me…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bedell Et Ux. v. GoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Carver v. MorrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. McDowell v. HurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plummer v. Donald M. Drake Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Binder v. Oregon BankOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kinsella v. LandaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API