Legal Opinion

Grattan v. Pihlblad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1942No. 35,607PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*840The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

A testator in his will named appellant to act as executor, expressed the hope he would accept and not resign, but if otherwise he named another person to be his executor. The probate court, upon the record noted herein, refused to appoint appellant and appointed the other person named. On appeal to the district court the rulings in the probate court were affirmed. Appellant contends these judgments were erroneous.

The record may be summarized or quoted from as follows: On September 4, 1941, there was filed in the office of the probate court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nonnast v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State ex rel. Abercrombie v. HoltcampSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  3. In Re Estate of BettsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Svacina v. East Wisconsin Trustee Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re Workman's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hood v. Lawrence National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Estate of Smith v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. In Re Estate of PettySupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Hollingsworth v. KoelschIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. In Re Estate of SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API