Legal Opinion

The Boca Mill Co. v. Curry

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1908No. S.F. No. 4997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a "Writ of Mandate directed to the Secretary of State of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an original proceeding instituted in this court by plaintiff, a California corporation, to obtain a writ of mandate requiring the defendant to file in his office a certified copy of a certificate of extension of its corporate existence.

The question presented by this proceeding is as to the constitutionality of an act of the legislature, approved March 18, 1907, purporting to amend section 401 of the Civil Code (Stats. 1907, p. 344), by the terms of which amendment “every corporation heretofore or hereafter formed, and existing under the laws of this state, may at any time prior to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taggart ex rel. Mason v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State v. DuketWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Board of Commissioners v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keetch v. CordnerUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Pacific Gas Etc. Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. McGranahan v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Bearden v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Reynolds v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API