Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bearden v. Collins

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 15157Published

1Dissent

SHENK, J., Dissenting.

I dissent.

There can be no escape from the conclusion that section 8 of article VI of the Constitution in plain and unambiguous language provides that a vacancy in the office of superior judge shall be filled by election at the general election occurring after the first day of April next succeeding the accrual of the vacancy, and that at such election the person elected shall hold for a full term of six years; also that the Governor shall appoint a person to fill such vacant office until the commencement of that full term.

When the Constitution, as to the facts presented,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaboard Acceptance Corp. v. ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Cypress Lawn Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Yosemite Lumber Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Story v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Beneficial Loan Society, Ltd. v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API