Legal Opinion

Keetch v. Cordner

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1936No. 5826PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELIAS HANSEN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs instituted an original action in this court to obtain a writ of mandamus commanding the defendants to proceed to wind up the affairs of the defendant corpora tion and distribute its assets to the stockholders thereof. The sole question presented for determination is whether or not within constitutional limitations a corporation may, by amending its articles of incorporation, extend the period of its corporate existence.

Briefly, the material facts upon which this controversy is bottomed are these: On April 16, 1883, plaintiff North Union Irrigation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weede v. Emma Copper Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. The Boca Mill Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trade Commission v. Skaggs Drug Centers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Robbins v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Morris v. Broadview, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1946
  4. State Ex Inf. Dalton Ex Rel. Holekamp v. Holekamp Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Drew v. Beckwith, Quinn & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API