Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Washtenaw Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

'Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to dismiss an appeal from the allowance of a claim by commissioners on claims in probate court. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

The relator asks for a mandamus to require respondent to dismiss an appeal claimed to have been taken by Hattie J. and Augusta E. Campbell, as heirs at law of Sardinnaiette Snyder, deceased, from an allowance, by the commissioners appointed in said estate, of relator's claim at $773.70.

Hattie J. and Augusta E. Campbell lived in Detroit. They employed counsel in Washtenaw county, where the estate was being administered, to make and perfect their appeal. On December 30, 1889, under direction of counsel, they made and filed in the probate court of Washtenaw county the following papers:

1. Their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garratt v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Verplank v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merriman v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. In re More's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Szarama v. Tylman's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Diamond Lumber Co. v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Gorton v. PersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API