Mouzon v. MOORE AND STEWART, INC.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
The appellant Joe Louis Mouzon brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries he received on his bicycle in a collision with an automobile driven by Ronald Burgess who was in the course of his employment with Moore & Stewart, Inc. (Moore). The basic issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury the law of “following too closely.” We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Mouzon’s counsel requested as an additional instruction that the trial court charge the jury the “following too closely” statute. The trial court refused…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Baker v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
- Clontz v. KrimmingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Daniels v. BernardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Jarvis v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baxley v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Ellison v. Parts Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Ellison v. PopeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Jefferson v. Synergy Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Williams v. AddisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.