Legal Opinion

Mouzon v. MOORE AND STEWART, INC.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 11, 1984No. 0195PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

The appellant Joe Louis Mouzon brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries he received on his bicycle in a collision with an automobile driven by Ronald Burgess who was in the course of his employment with Moore & Stewart, Inc. (Moore). The basic issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury the law of “following too closely.” We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Mouzon’s counsel requested as an additional instruction that the trial court charge the jury the “following too closely” statute. The trial court refused…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Baker v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Clontz v. KrimmingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Daniels v. BernardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Jarvis v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baxley v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Ellison v. Parts Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Ellison v. PopeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Jefferson v. Synergy Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Williams v. AddisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API