Legal Opinion

Shammel v. Vogl

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1964No. 10571PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MB. CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES T. HARRISON,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This action is one to quiet title to a water right and its appurtenant ditch easement, hereinafter referred to as the Weidman right, and involves the East Fork of Big Spring Creek in Fergus County, Montana. The Creek flows north across the land of the defendants (George and Elizabeth Vogl) and then turns east a short distance onto the land of one Bacon before continuing to flow north and onto the land of the plaintiff (Lee Shammel). Plaintiff’s land is, therefore, downstream of the defendants’. The legal description of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Felsenthal v. WarringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Murray v. TingleyMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Laden v. AtkesonMontana Supreme Court · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. San Jacinto Sand Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Rieman v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Holmstrom Land Co. v. Meagher County Newlan Creek Water DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. O'CONNOR v. BrodieMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. 79 Ranch, Inc. v. PitschMontana Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API