Legal Opinion

79 Ranch, Inc. v. Pitsch

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1983No. 82-361PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Plaintiffs, 79 Ranch and Harry Vandervoort, began this action in 1977 seeking to enjoin defendant Pitsch from us*429ing water in Big Coulee Creek, and seeking a determination of each party’s water rights in the creek. After a hearing, the District Court entered scant findings and established the following water rights and priorities:

“(a) Vandervoort — 50 inches for use on Wl/2 Section 23-6N-21E., with priority date as of June 1, 1924.
“(b) 79 Ranch — 45 inches for use on SWV4 Section 25-5N-19E., with priority date as of June 13, 1973.
“(c) Pitsch — 68 inches for use on Section 35-5N-19E., with…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tucker v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Galiger v. McNultyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. St. Onge v. BlakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation v. Intake Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Smith v. KrutarMontana Supreme Court · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Skelton Ranch, Inc. v. Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights of Yellowstone RiverMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Heavirland v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Axtell v. M.S. ConsultingMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. City of Helena v. Community of RiminiMontana Supreme Court · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API