Legal Opinion

Mullus v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 11, 1925No. A-4949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant, as in the court below.

From a conviction upon a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell, the defendant has appealed.

Numerous assignments of error are embodied in the petition in error but all are directed to the contention that the search warrant is invalid. It is first argued that the search warrant is invalid, for the reason that the affidavit upon which it is based states a mere legal conclusion, and no sufficient facts are contained in it sufficient to warrant the issuance of a search warrant, citing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Hannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Viadock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Overturf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. McCarthy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Skelton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Boggess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Waltrip v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API