Legal Opinion
Viadock v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 23, 1925No. A-4813PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant. Defendant was convicted in the district court of Pittsburg county for a felony as a second conviction under the liquor laws of the state, and sentenced to a term of 5 years in the penitentiary, and to pay a fine of $2,000, and appeals.
The record discloses that the defendant is a Lithuanian, a widow with 8 children, the oldest 14 years of age. Apparently she is a persistent offender against the liquor laws. Counsel for defendant assigns error, first, in admitting evidence obtained by an illegal search warrant; second, error in statements…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Koontz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Star v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hicks v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Bigfeather v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Crim v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Hensley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
- State v. FeatherstoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Winer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.