Legal Opinion

Gore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1923No. A-4075PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.

F. G. Gore, plaintiff in error, here designated the defendant, was by information filed in the county court of Caddo county, April 27, 1921, charged with having on that day manufactured spirituous liquors by a method of distillation from some unknown substance containing alcohol as a by-product through the operation of an apparatus known as a whisky still. At the trial, June 10, 1921, by a verdict of the jury, the defendant was found guilty as charged, without assessing the punishment. Subsequently the court rendered judgment upon the verdict, fixing the defendant’s punishment at a fine of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. State v. LaroccoUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. ArreguiIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Keith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API