Legal Opinion

Mansperger v. Ehrnfield

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S herí ok, J.

This appeal presents a question of law made upon the trial court’s puling in sustaining defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case. The action is for damages for personal injury to plaintiff, a pedestrian, sustained whil¿ attempting to cross a public street at a place other than a crosswalk in a portion of the city of Zanesville theretofore denominated by ordinance as within the closely built up business section.

Plaintiff’s evidence establishes that he was returning from work shortly after midnight in an automobile driven by a fellow employee;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ivy v. MarxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Crowl v. West Coast Steel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Snyder Et Ux. v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Horwitz v. EuroveOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Collins v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sanchez v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sorrels v. RyanMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Gates v. DillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Cashen v. DunkelOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API