Commonwealth v. Johnson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
These are consolidated appeals from judgments of sentence for first degree murder and related offenses. Appellants, Joseph D’Amato (“D’Amato”) and Clarence Johnson (“Johnson”), present the following claims: 1
I. Was the instant prosecution of defendant D’Amato barred by a prior agreement or grant of immunity in other unrelated cases; by the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions and 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110?
II. Was the instant prosecution barred by the applicable statute of limitations?
III. Was counsel for defendant Johnson ineffective for failing…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. YountSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. Christine, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. McSloySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.