Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1992No. 1063 and 1111PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

These are consolidated appeals from judgments of sentence for first degree murder and related offenses. Appellants, Joseph D’Amato (“D’Amato”) and Clarence Johnson (“Johnson”), present the following claims: 1

I. Was the instant prosecution of defendant D’Amato barred by a prior agreement or grant of immunity in other unrelated cases; by the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions and 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110?

II. Was the instant prosecution barred by the applicable statute of limitations?

III. Was counsel for defendant Johnson ineffective for failing…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. YountSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. Christine, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. McSloySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API