Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McSloy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 2000PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 In this criminal matter, we address, inter alia, the application of the statute of limitations for theft by deception, conspiracy, and fraud under the insurance law. On direct appeal, we are asked to determine whether appellant Robert McSloy’s counsel was ineffective in failing to renew a motion to dismiss charges based on the statute of limitations, and in failing to call certain character witnesses. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of sentence.

¶ 2 A jury convicted appellant of theft by deception, criminal conspiracy, and fraud under the Pennsylvania insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. CopenheferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. GroffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FarmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. SucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Gaspard, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Com. v. Black, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Cabrera, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API