Legal Opinion

Beckstrom v. Coastwise Line

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided February 5, 1953No. Civ. No. 7821PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, District Judge.

This is an action for damages arising out of an alleged contract for carriage of merchandize by sea, or, in the alternative, carriage partly by sea and partly by land. The plaintiff claims damages in the amount of $28,530.38 from crushing of the merchandize.

The defendant, Coastwise, in its answer to the amended complaint, included several affirmative defenses, none of which either by name or in nature constitutes a counterclaim or a cross-claim. The fourth affirmative defense asserts that the damage to the goods arose or resulted from insufficiency of packing for which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. NeedleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Porter v. Theo J. Ely Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Bankers Bond & Mortgage Co. v. WitherowDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Mission Appliance Corp. v. Ajax Thermostatic Controls Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cheek v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. In Re Enron Corporation Securities, DerivativeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
  3. Preveden v. Croatian Fraternal Union of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Garner v. MoralesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  5. Gates v. Gates'Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API