Legal Opinion
Bankers Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Witherow
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1940No. 567PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
On petition of the defendant, a Rule was granted on the plaintiff to show cause why it should not file a reply to the “New Matter” set up in the defendant’s Answer.
The Rules of Civil Procedure require that “An application to the court for an order shall be by motion * * * Rule 7 (b) (1), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. It will be so considered.
The plaintiff holds a bond of the present principal balance of $2,500, secured by a first mortgage upon premises No. 5421 Belmar Terrace, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The property was for several years owned by the defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United Security Trust Company CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Presgrave v. StephensDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Beckstrom v. Coastwise LineDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
- Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Estate of Presgrave v. StephensDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987