Legal Opinion

Porter v. Theo J. Ely Mfg. Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1946No. Civil Action No. 3190PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE S. GOURLEY, District • Judge.

This case involves an action for injunctive relief and treble damages, which had been filed by the plaintiff on August 29, 1944, against the following defendants: Theo J. Ely Manufacturing Company, a corporation, otherwise known as Theodore J. Ely Manufacturing Company, James A. Meldon, receiver thereof, and Carl Bernie Oas, individually and trading as Theo J.' Ely Manufacturing Company, otherwise known as Theodore J. Ely Manufacturing Company, Erie Mop and Wringer Company and Harrington Machine Company.

The claim for injunctive relief is based on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  5. Ronald Press Co. v. SheaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kerner v. RackmillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Adams v. Beland Realty CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
  3. De Franco v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  4. Green v. WalshDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957
  5. Munetz v. Eaton Yale & Towne, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API