Legal Opinion
Garner v. Morales
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 5, 2006No. C.A. No. C-06-218PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION
OWSLEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is a civil rights action filed by a state prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time to file a reply to defendants’ answer is pending. (D.E. 30). Specifically, he seeks thirty additional days to file a reply.
Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure addresses the filing of pleadings. In relevant part, it states:
There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of United States National Bank v. First National Finance Company, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of United States National Bank v. United Oil Well Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Lopata v. HandlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Beckstrom v. Coastwise LineDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
- Lopata v. HandlerDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Chatham County Voter's RegistrationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023
- Coleman v. Office of The State AuditorDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021
- Lyall v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019