Legal Opinion

State v. Hansen

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1985No. 14632PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by Joseph Scott Hansen from a conviction of rape, following a jury trial. I.C. § 18-6101. On appeal, Hansen contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion either to suppress an expert witness’s testimony or alternatively to grant a continuance in order to prepare for such testimony due to late disclosure by the prosecutor. Hansen further argues that the trial court erred in giving certain jury instructions. We reject both of these contentions and affirm.

It was undisputed at trial that the victim, while hitchhiking, accepted a ride with Hansen and his passenger.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SmootIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WardIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. TisdelIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. PecorIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. CaneloIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. SchafferIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. HiassenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API