Legal Opinion

State v. Hiassen

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1986No. 15680, 15681PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Joe Schuck and Scott Hiassen were convicted, in a joint trial, of first degree burglary and grand theft. After the theft counts were reduced to petit theft, the defendants received withheld judgments and were placed on probation. On appeal they contend that evidence, including confessions, was erroneously admitted and that their motion to postpone the trial should have been granted. We affirm.

This case involves an unusual situation. During the relevant period Joe Schuck, then eighteen years old, lived in Council, Idaho, with Rick Waters, an Adams County deputy sheriff. Schuck…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MedranoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. FairchildIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. HoffmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. SpradlinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API