State v. Canelo
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Jose R. Canelo was found guilty by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732(a)(l)(A). On appeal, he claims that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion for a mistrial after the state failed to provide timely discovery of material evidence; (2) refusing to instruct the jury on the affirmative defenses of entrapment and duress; and (3) admitting evidence of other bad acts. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Jose Canelo was indicted on one count of delivery of a controlled substance. I.C. §…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. UrquhartIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BabbIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. WhippleIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. BarcellaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. ButcherIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. PachecoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.