State v. Stich
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Defendant appeals from conviction of lewdly fondling and manipulating the private parts of a nine-year-old female child. ORS 167.227.
Defendant claims error in (1) allowing the child victim to testify; (2) overruling a demurrer on the ground of unconstitutional vagueness of the statute; and (3) denial of motion for a directed verdict of acquittal on the ground of insufficient competent evidence.(1). ORS 44.030 provides that children under ten years of age who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts respecting which they are examined, or of relating them truly, may not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State of Oregon v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. SamterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Portland v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Palm Gardens, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. MarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. LantzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.