Legal Opinion

State v. Longoria

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1974No. C 73-02-0466 CrPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

The defendant was convicted after a jury trial of four counts of robbery in the first degree. ORS 164.415. He appeals, assigning several rulings as error.

First, he assigns the failure of the presiding judge to grant his motion for a continuance and of the trial judge to grant his renewed motion for a continuance.

The motion before the presiding judge was oral and conclusory. ORS 136.070① requires that a motion for continuance by the defendant be accompanied by an affidavit showing “sufficient cause” which shall be “first filed with the clerk.” Since the ruling upon a motion for continuance is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. PaceOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. ThomsonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. WalgraeveOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. Jones v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ZuckArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. LantzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Fountain v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API