Legal Opinion
Taliaferro v. Ballard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 11, 1941No. 30118PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
From a judgment and decree of foreclosure the mortgagors have appealed.
Defendants in error now move to dismiss for failure of plaintiffs in error to make the second mortgagee a party to the proceedings on review.
The second mortgagee, Commercial Standard Insurance Company, was a party defendant in the trial court. By the judgment its mortgage was held inferior and subject to the mortgage of the defendants in error, and all defendants, including said company, were forever barred and foreclosed from asserting any right, title, or interest in and to the premises from and after the sale thereof.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- John v. PaullinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- George v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Moser v. Board of Trustees of Town of ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gill v. First National Bank Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Harden v. B of E Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 22Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- McDonald v. HarrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Hazel v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Champlin v. FrantzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949