People v. Contreras

Pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, the prosecution appeals an order granting the defendant’s motions to suppress evidence and statements on the grounds there was no probable cause to arrest the defendant. The trial court erred in not considering an anonymous tip as part of the totality of the circumstances. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

The defendant, David Armando Contreras, was charged by information with theft of motor vehicle parts, section 42-5-104,17 C.R.S. (1988 Supp.), and conspiracy to commit theft of motor vehicle parts, section…