Legal Opinion

People v. Diaz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 16, 1990No. 89SA392PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

The district attorney brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 and section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1989 Supp.), to challenge an order from the Pueblo County District Court suppressing certain tangible evidence and statements. We affirm the district court’s suppression order.

I

The defendant, David Diaz, was charged with the unlawful possession of cocaine, a schedule II controlled substance in violation of section 18-18-105(l)(a) and (2)(a), 8B C.R.S. (1986). Diaz filed a motion to suppress all evidence found and statements made during the course of his search and arrest on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. People v. PannebakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. People v. TrujilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. People v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. People v. PateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Henderson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. Magallanes-AragonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API