Legal Opinion

People v. Padgett

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 24, 1997No. 96SA420PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

The People, pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 and section 16-12-102(2), 8A C.R.S. (1996 Supp.), bring this interlocutory appeal challenging the order of the trial court suppressing evidence of a controlled substance, marihuana, found on the defendant.1 The trial court determined that the police officers did not have a reasonable and articulable basis in fact to make the investigatory stop, nor was there sufficient attenuation between the initial illegal stop and the discovery of the evidence. We agree and affirm the trial court’s suppression order.

I

At approximately 1:50 a.m. on January 18, 1996, Police…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. State v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. People v. PaynterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. People v. ArchuletaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. People v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API