Farmers' Bank of Weston v. Ellis
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
The disposition of the motion to strike disposes of practically all of the material issues presented on this appeal. Plaintiff claims that the further and separate answers and defenses are immaterial and irrelevant because by the former decision in this case defendants are precluded from making the defenses attempted by their answers. Motion to strike is the proper method of testing an answer on the ground that the allegations moved against are immaterial or irrelevant: Hubbard v. Olsen-Roe Transfer Co., 110 Or. 618 (224 Pac. 636).
It was determined in the former decision that the warehouse…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hubbard v. Olsen-Roe Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Hartford Ins. v. Central R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
- The Multorpor Co. v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Conley v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Bank of California National Ass'n v. SchmaltzOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Johnson v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1933