In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of Kling
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leslie R. Hewitt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by D. G-. Kling from a judgment of the superior court suspending him as an attorney and counselor at law from practicing his profession for a period of one year from March 10, 1919.
[1] The trial court made no findings of fact, and, conceding that findings in such eases are not essential to the validity of a judgment, nevertheless it is a practice not to be commended.
Want of such findings renders it necessary for us to state at length the facts which we deem established by the evidence. It appears therefrom that appellant and his sister, R. J. Kling, were the proprietors of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCloskey v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Cobb v. DoggettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Board of Dental Examiners v. LazzellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Call v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- California-Western States Life Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re KlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.