Legal Opinion
United States v. Mangiaracina
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided October 4, 1950No. 17780PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Judge.
Counsel for the defendant have filed a motion for a bill of particulars authorized by paragraph (f) Rule 7, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. This rule provides that:
“The court for cause may direct the filing of a bill of particulars. A motion for a bill of particulars may be made only within ten days after arraignment or at such other time before or after arraignment as may be prescribed by rule or order.”
Except probably in the case of the first sentence, the law relating to bills of particulars remains as it was at common law. The practice of moving for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kettenbach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Norris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Tubbs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- United States v. McKayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. UdellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1952
- United States v. TrownsellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953
- United States v. CasserinoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- United States v. BrodsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.