Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Casserino

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 30, 1960No. 60-Cr-338PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTELS, District Judge.

Defendant moves to (i) dismiss the information herein as legally insufficient, and in the alternative (ii) to compel a bill of particulars.

The information charges that defendant on or about June 2, 1960 “in *289the United States Postal Concentration Station, Long Island City, Queens, New York, a place within the exclusive territorial jurisdiction of the United States * * * did engage in bookmaking, and for the purpose of recording and registering bets and wagers did register and records bets, and did make book, upon the result of contests of the speed of beasts, to wit:…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Fredrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. United States v. Claude PalmiottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. United States v. KelleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. U. S. A. v. ElifeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1962
  5. United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API