Legal Opinion

Kettenbach v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1913No. 2,080PublishedCited by 52 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Idaho; R. S. Bean, Judge. William" F. Kettenbach and George H. Kester were-convicted of violating the National Bank Act, and they bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error were indicted under four indictments — Nos. 777, 779, 780, and 782 — all charging them with violations of section 5209 of the Revised Statutes ,(U. Si Comp'. St. 1901," p. 3497). " They entered a plea of “not guilty” to each indictment, and thereafter, upon their motion for the consolidation of the indictments, an order was made consolidating the same for trial. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on counts 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 of in.dictment 780, and returned a verdict of not guilty on the other indictments and on count 3 of 780.

[ 1 ] It is"…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. James R. Russell, Jr. v. The Monongahela Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Smith v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. United States v. GlasserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  5. Thomas Curtis Bush v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API