Legal Opinion

Peroutka v. Cronin

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2008No. 27233PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

Appellants Michael A. Peroutka, Chuck Baldwin (“Peroutka/Baldwin”), David P. Porter (“Porter”), and Ralph Nader, Peter Miguel Camejo (“Nader/Camejo”), and Robert H. Stiver (“Stiver”) (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal from the first circuit court’s April 5, 2005 final judgments in favor of Appellee, Kevin B. Cronin (“Chief Election Officer”). 2 The instant case is a consolidated secondary appeal from the circuit court’s April 5, 2005 judgments affirming the decisions of the Chief Election Officer. On appeal, Appellants present the following points of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dole Hawaii Division-Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. RamilHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bumanglag v. Oahu Sugar Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Sifagaloa v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement SystemHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alaka'i Na Keiki, Inc. v. MatayoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  2. AlohaCare v. ItoHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Dupree v. HiragaHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. TranHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA Inc. v. Director, Department of Budget & Fiscal ServicesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API