Legal Opinion

AlohaCare v. Ito

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2012No. SCAP-30276PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

RECKTENWALD, C.J.

AlohaCare, a health maintenance organization, submitted a proposal to the Department of Human Services to bid for a Quest Expanded Access contract to provide healthcare services for aged, blind, or disabled participants in the State’s Medicaid program. Alo-haCare was not one of the successful bidders. The Department of Human Services instead awarded Quest Expanded Access contracts to United Healthcare Insurance Company, dba Evercare (United), and WellCare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc., dba Ohana Health Plan (Ohana).

*329AlohaCare petitioned the Insurance…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hawaii Medical Ass'n v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Lingle v. Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME, Local 152Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Gump v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Huffman v. Indiana Office of Environmental AdjudicationIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Asato v. Procurement Policy Board, State of Hawaii.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Pila‘a 400, LLC v. Board of Land and Natural Resources.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  3. District Council 50 of the International Union of Painters & Allied Trades v. Lopez.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Kanahele v. Maui County Council.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Lawson v. Attorney General.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API