Legal Opinion

Bumanglag v. Oahu Sugar Co., Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1995No. 16591PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

Employer-Appellant Oahu Sugar Company (Employer) and Insurance Adjuster-Appellant Acclamation Insurance Management Services (Adjuster) appeal the Decision and Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (Board) holding that the permanent partial disability benefits of Claimant-Appellee Andres Bumanglag (Claimant) cannot be apportioned with the Appellee Special Compensation Fund (SCF). Employer and Adjuster argue that the Board erred in concluding that Claimant did not have a preexisting partial disability of thirty-two weeks of compensation necessary to warrant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tate v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Molokoa Village Development Co. v. Kauai Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. MezurashiHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Yarnell v. City Roofing, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Flores v. City of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. DudoitHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Korsak v. Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kahana Sunset Owners Ass'n v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API