Legal Opinion
Young v. City Nat. Bank of Lawton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 21, 1925No. 15038PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
This action was instituted by the City National Bank of Lawton against Vinnie L. Young and George E. Young and others, and the amended petition contains 26 causes of action.
The first cause of action alleges that Vin-nie L. Young and George E. Young made, executed, and delivered their certain promissory note in the principal sum of $10,009 to the plaintiff, who is the owner and holder thereof. This note bears date as of the 9th day of September, 1920, the due date being December 31, 1920, and by the terms of the note the bank was given full authority to sell any collateral…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Oates v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- West v. MadanskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Hanna v. KassonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- State Exch. Bank of Elk City v. National Bank of Commerce of St. LouisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City Nat. Bank of Lawton, Okl. v. Lummus Cotton Gin Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Muskogee Sand & Gravel Co. v. HulbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931