Legal Opinion
Seely v. Oklahoma Horse Racing Commission
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 25, 1987No. 64123PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY, Judge:
This case comes on for review of the denial of Appellant’s petition for review of the Oklahoma Horse Racing Commission’s (Appellee or Commission) imposition of fines and suspension of Appellant W.C. “Dub” Seely (Appellant or Seely). Seely was the trainer of two horses, Tree Lark and Shawnee Native, which ran in races at Blue Ribbon Downs on November 22nd and 29th of 1984, respectively. Each horse won its respective event and underwent urine testing immediately after the races. Urinalysis revealed that each horse had been administered the chemical substance, La-six. Lasix is a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Morris v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
- Shackford & Gooch, Inc. v. Town of KennebunkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- City of Tulsa v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees v. GarrettCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Pharmcare Oklahoma, Inc. v. State Health Care AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- DiMauro v. Oklahoma State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.