A. S. Moyer and Nita Moyer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Being dissatisfied with the jury’s verdict, the defendants in this condemnation case seek a new trial. In support of their request, the defendants allege that the trial court erred in two particulars.
The first assignment of error goes to the trial court’s having admitted into evidence an aerial photograph which defendants claim did not accurately depict their property. 1 The second assignment of error relates to certain maps which the Government supplied defendants during pretrial proceedings and which defendants claim were represented as being identical to those that the Government would…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hampton v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Snibbe v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Chicago G. W. R. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Lupton v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- George Willis, Iii, Administrator D.B.N. Of Estate of Jacob Willie Bell, Deceased v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.