Hampton v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action for damages against the defendant. The complaint states that the injury complained of was received in 1894, but it does not appear from the evidence whether it was in 1894 or 1895. The defendant's road runs through the City of Winston, along Tenth Street, which had been excavated to a depth of about thirty feet at the point where the injury was received.
It is in evidence that the plaintiff, on the night of the injury, went to Watlington's store, which fronts on Liberty Street, and purchased about sixty pounds of groceries, put them in a bag and started home, and by some…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Barcello v. . HapgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Carey v. GilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Burwell v. . SneedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Riddle v. Town of GermantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Davis v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- State v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.