Legal Opinion

Anderson v. City Development Board of the Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 25, 2001No. 99-0932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

There are three parties involved in this appeal. The City Development Board of the State of Iowa (Board) is the appellant. The City of Des Moines (DSM) intervened in these proceedings and is also an appellant. The citizens of the unincorporated territory of “West Carlisle,” led by John Anderson, are the appellees. At the agency level, the Board dismissed West Car-lisle’s involuntary petition to be annexed into Carlisle. On judicial review, the district court reversed this dismissal. We reverse the district court’s decision and remand for a reinstatement of the petition’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Office of Consumer Advocate v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. City of Waukee v. City Development BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Ahrendsen v. Iowa Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. City of Cedar Rapids v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pruss v. Cedar Rapids/Hiawatha Annexation Special Local CommitteeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. David Michael Johnston v. Iowa Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API