Legal Opinion

Pruss v. Cedar Rapids/Hiawatha Annexation Special Local Committee

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 15, 2004No. 03-1091PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

A landowner, drawn to the charm of the bright lights and sewer services of Cedar Rapids, resists the annexing embrace of Hiawatha. A .special committee of the City Development Board approved the City of Hiawatha’s petition to involuntarily annex Francis Pruss’s land, and denied a similar request by Cedar Rapids. Pruss and Cedar Rapids complain the Committee’s interpretation of a state annexation law was wrong, because their request was not afforded the “presumption of validity” expressly granted to voluntary annexations. They also argue Cedar Rapids, and not Hiawatha, could…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
  2. Mycogen Seeds v. SandsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Soo Line Railroad v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. City of Hampton v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. City of Waukee v. City Development BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Asbury v. Iowa City Development BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. Archer Daniels Midland v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023
  3. City Of Asbury, Iowa Vs. The Iowa City Development BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. City of Dubuque v. City Development BoardCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025
  5. P.M. Lattner Manufacturing Co. v. RifeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API