Legal Opinion

Office of Consumer Advocate v. Iowa State Commerce Commission

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 23, 1991No. 89-996PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This appeal examines the distinction drawn between general and non-general utility rate increases and the hearing requirements applicable to each. The controversy stems from proposed increases in charges for telephone operator service and directory assistance. Although the Utilities Board concluded without hearing that the increases were reasonable, the district court decided on judicial review that making such a factual determination on the present record without an opportunity for evidentiary hearing violated the objector’s constitutional rights to due process. We agree and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Polk County Iowa v. Iowa State Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Martin Bros. Box Co. v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Allegre v. Iowa State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Soo Line Railroad v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Greenwood Manor v. Iowa Department of Public Health, State Health Facilities CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. David Taft v. Iowa District Court for Linn CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Staff Management and New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Pascuala JimenezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Paula Segura and Ricardo Segura v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API