Legal Opinion

Tudor Development Group, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-0758PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

Defendant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (USF & G) has filed a combined motion to dismiss, motion to strike and motion for a more definite statement. Plaintiffs, Tudor Development Group, Inc. and Sidney Cohen, Dorothy Cohen and Marc Cohen, trading as Green Hill Associates, a limited partnership (Green Hill), al lege various causes of action against USF & G, the surety for certain phases of a real estate development, (the Green Hill Project or Project), being constructed for Green Hill by Susquehanna Construction Co. (the “Contractor”). Basically,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Blumer v. DorfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. General Insurance v. Mammoth Vista Owners' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Waye v. First Citizen's National BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Eds Adjusters, Inc. v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. White v. Moses Taylor HospitalDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Quinn Construction, Inc. v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Waye v. Commonwealth BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API